View source for Neocron Wiki talk:Sysop Policy

==Delition Policy==
Deletion policy is immensely lackluster and superficial. If the current rules are to be followed deletion may never ocuour, only deletion flags. No procedure has been set for final deletion of a flagged page meaning that as it stands once a page has been flagged it will remain in Limbo indefinitely.
In response to this I suggest the implementation of a wikipedia type system. Under the rules of the wikipedia anyone with due cause may flag an article or file for deletion. Due cause is determined within deletion policy and specific cause must be cited and referenced within said articles talk page. A 7 day window is given for violations to be rectified (wikipedia deletion templates include timestamps) after which the page will be deleted by an admin if it still bears the deletion flag. This will give an easy to follow foolproof procedure for content deletion.
However i would also suggest we adopt another tendon of wikipedia's deletion policy. Wikipedia allows its sysops a certain "Admins prerogative" with regards to deletion. This means that any obvious rule violations or superfluous content may be deleted at will without prior notifications. This includes violations of core policy's, duplicate content and and irrelevant content.
Of course none of this can be instated unless something is also done about the dilapidated state of Neocron Wiki's policy's. --[[User:Solid Rock|Solid Rock]] 23:06, 5 May 2008 (BST)

== Formating and Expansion ==

Ive removed the empty "Formatting" and "Expansion" headers. Formating policy for sysops is exactly the same as it is for ordinary users and I do not see what the "Expansion" header was meant to contain. If someone feels a burning need to have these two subsections on the sysop policy than feel free to re-add them, as long as you add some actual points to them. Otherwise theyr just useless fillers. --[[User:Solid Rock|Solid Rock]] 07:29, 8 May 2008 (BST)