Latest Neocron News and Information
- New test server patch #572 has been released to Vedeena
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Tradeskill"
Logan Ford (talk | contribs) (Created page with 'I am going to have a go at organising this tradeskill portal into a resonable basic page. Further detailed information will be linked from here. I then plan to move on and use …') |
m |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I am going to have a go at organising this tradeskill portal into a resonable basic page. Further detailed information will be linked from here. I then plan to move on and use the content available and add to it etc. --{{:User:Logan Ford/Sig2}} 12:18, 6 August 2009 (UTC) | I am going to have a go at organising this tradeskill portal into a resonable basic page. Further detailed information will be linked from here. I then plan to move on and use the content available and add to it etc. --{{:User:Logan Ford/Sig2}} 12:18, 6 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Contents == | ||
| + | |||
| + | OK should this cover hacking and barter? they are tradeskills are they not?--{{:User:Logan Ford/Sig2}} 12:43, 11 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Barter - Yes, Hacking I say that's a secondary skill/support skill and not a tadeskill. --[[User:Brammers|Brammers]] 09:47, 13 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Aeon Blur|Aeon Blur]] '''11:30am PDT, 21 December -''' <br /> I would also like to see the actual skill formulae used as on [http://forum.neocron.com/showthread.php?t=118196&page=1&pp=15] for the relevant sections. Most new players (and many Vets) don't have a clue how these are actually calculated at all and it leads Runners to make mistakes in point allocations.<br /> ''...God knows I made enough mistakes with it...'' <br /> | ||
| + | The formulae are: | ||
| + | Construction: 0.1(10%) DEX + 0.2(20%) INT + 0.7(70%) CST | ||
| + | Research: 0.3(30%) INT + 0.7(70%) RES | ||
| + | Repair: 0.2(20%) DEX + 0.1(10%) INT + 0.7(70%) REP | ||
| + | Recycle: 0.3(30%) DEX + 0.7(70%) REC | ||
| + | Hacking: 0.9(90%) HCK + 0.1(10%) RCL | ||
| + | Implant: 0.2(20%) DEX + 0.3(30%) INT + 0.5(50%) IMP | ||
| + | Barter: 0.03(3%) INT + 0.35(35%) BRT | ||
| + | My question though, is whether these numbers are still relevant, or have been changed in 2.2 (since the original post was dated 2004). The implant skill entry seems a bit off to me, since it's a straight requirement number and even a /20 toon with 115 IMP can do MC5 chips (unless its an IMP speed effect?). Did I miss something? | ||
Latest revision as of 19:42, 22 December 2010
I am going to have a go at organising this tradeskill portal into a resonable basic page. Further detailed information will be linked from here. I then plan to move on and use the content available and add to it etc. --[admin] Logan Ford • (talk) 12:18, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
Contents
OK should this cover hacking and barter? they are tradeskills are they not?--[admin] Logan Ford • (talk) 12:43, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Barter - Yes, Hacking I say that's a secondary skill/support skill and not a tadeskill. --Brammers 09:47, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
Aeon Blur 11:30am PDT, 21 December -
I would also like to see the actual skill formulae used as on [1] for the relevant sections. Most new players (and many Vets) don't have a clue how these are actually calculated at all and it leads Runners to make mistakes in point allocations.
...God knows I made enough mistakes with it...
The formulae are:
Construction: 0.1(10%) DEX + 0.2(20%) INT + 0.7(70%) CST Research: 0.3(30%) INT + 0.7(70%) RES Repair: 0.2(20%) DEX + 0.1(10%) INT + 0.7(70%) REP Recycle: 0.3(30%) DEX + 0.7(70%) REC Hacking: 0.9(90%) HCK + 0.1(10%) RCL Implant: 0.2(20%) DEX + 0.3(30%) INT + 0.5(50%) IMP Barter: 0.03(3%) INT + 0.35(35%) BRT
My question though, is whether these numbers are still relevant, or have been changed in 2.2 (since the original post was dated 2004). The implant skill entry seems a bit off to me, since it's a straight requirement number and even a /20 toon with 115 IMP can do MC5 chips (unless its an IMP speed effect?). Did I miss something?
