Difference between revisions of "Talk:Via Rosso"

Revision as of 09:01, 27 June 2008

Is it viarosso? or Via Rosso? because both have been spelt in the article and we need conformity - I have a feeling its the first although we could do with someone checking :) --δρ • Delphi ^{(t) • (c)} 00:54, 27 June 2008 (BST)
Checked in game it's Viarosso thats is shown on the location section of the Rpos and the entering of district messages, and also the direction signs to Viarosso.
However in the official history found both here and on neocron.com it is spelt Via Rosso. --Reaction 01:44, 27 June 2008 (BST)

Just had a quick glance at the game manual and its Via Rosso in there too. --Reaction 02:24, 27 June 2008 (BST)
Hahahaha good old KK ;) We need to decide which convention we are going to follow then - I think my vote would go for Viarsso seen as that is what it seems to be called in game --δρ • Delphi ^{(t) • (c)} 07:20, 27 June 2008 (BST)
- I always assumed it was (and prefer) Via Rosso, but the GR name and sector map each say "VIAROSSO", so I guess that makes more sense --StevenJ 10:01, 27 June 2008 (BST)

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 :* Just had a quick glance at the game manual and its Via Rosso in there too. --[[User:Reaction|Reaction]] 02:24, 27 June 2008 (BST)
 :* Hahahaha good old KK ;) We need to decide which convention we are going to follow then - I think my vote would go for Viarsso seen as that is what it seems to be called in game --{{:User:Delphi/Sig2}} 07:20, 27 June 2008 (BST)
+:**I always assumed it was (and prefer) Via Rosso, but the GR name and sector map each say "VIAROSSO", so I guess that makes more sense --[[User:StevenJ|StevenJ]] 10:01, 27 June 2008 (BST)