Latest Neocron News and Information

  • New test server patch #563 has been released to Vedeena

Difference between revisions of "Talk:MIRL-600 Warhammer Mission"

From Neocron Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
This is my first go at a mission walkthrough. I spent a fair bit of time on the mission, I couldn't get a WB spawn! As always feedback is welcomed, could anything be ammended or is it all ok? Additionaly the Warhammer doesn't have an icon in the items db, something for Brammers to sort? --[[User:Reaction|Reaction]] 14:53, 23 June 2008 (BST)
 
This is my first go at a mission walkthrough. I spent a fair bit of time on the mission, I couldn't get a WB spawn! As always feedback is welcomed, could anything be ammended or is it all ok? Additionaly the Warhammer doesn't have an icon in the items db, something for Brammers to sort? --[[User:Reaction|Reaction]] 14:53, 23 June 2008 (BST)
 
* WarHammer pic added, cheers :D --[[User:StevenJ|StevenJ]] 20:20, 23 June 2008 (BST)
 
* WarHammer pic added, cheers :D --[[User:StevenJ|StevenJ]] 20:20, 23 June 2008 (BST)
** Though not showing in the page... think this may be a cache layer issue... --[[User:StevenJ|StevenJ]] 20:22, 23 June 2008 (BST)
+
** Though not showing in the page... think this may be a cache layer issue... very sexy article though! --[[User:StevenJ|StevenJ]] 20:22, 23 June 2008 (BST)
 +
* Ah, the wiki cache is enabled. All fixed up now, ty Bram :P --[[User:StevenJ|StevenJ]] 21:02, 23 June 2008 (BST)

Latest revision as of 20:02, 23 June 2008

Walkthrough

This is my first go at a mission walkthrough. I spent a fair bit of time on the mission, I couldn't get a WB spawn! As always feedback is welcomed, could anything be ammended or is it all ok? Additionaly the Warhammer doesn't have an icon in the items db, something for Brammers to sort? --Reaction 14:53, 23 June 2008 (BST)

  • WarHammer pic added, cheers :D --StevenJ 20:20, 23 June 2008 (BST)
    • Though not showing in the page... think this may be a cache layer issue... very sexy article though! --StevenJ 20:22, 23 June 2008 (BST)
  • Ah, the wiki cache is enabled. All fixed up now, ty Bram :P --StevenJ 21:02, 23 June 2008 (BST)