Latest Neocron News and Information
- New test server patch #563 has been released to Vedeena
Difference between revisions of "Neocron Wiki talk:Community Portal"
From Neocron Wiki
Solid Rock (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
== Policies == | == Policies == | ||
There's going to need to be quite a few of these. The first thing that strikes my mind is: articles about players, player characters and clans. Are they allowed at all? What is allowed to be said? Who is supposed to contribute? Etc... | There's going to need to be quite a few of these. The first thing that strikes my mind is: articles about players, player characters and clans. Are they allowed at all? What is allowed to be said? Who is supposed to contribute? Etc... | ||
Then we have the question of do we try and replicate (to some degree) policies like Wikipedia's verifiability and NPOV? Etc? [[User:CMaster|CMaster]] 15:28, 7 November 2006 (GMT) | Then we have the question of do we try and replicate (to some degree) policies like Wikipedia's verifiability and NPOV? Etc? [[User:CMaster|CMaster]] 15:28, 7 November 2006 (GMT) | ||
| − | + | :I agree - some policies will need to be created to get people to agree to it - I dont mind pages being created about players and clans as it would allow a nice roleplaying situation to occur where people could be hyper linked - although it could also cause flames and grafiti. --[[User:Delphi|Delphi]] 16:09, 7 November 2006 (GMT) | |
| − | I agree - some policies will need to be created to get people to agree to it - I dont mind pages being created about players and clans as it would allow a nice roleplaying situation to occur where people could be hyper linked - although it could also cause flames and grafiti. --[[User:Delphi|Delphi]] 16:09, 7 November 2006 (GMT) | + | ::Id say clan articles should be left out but articles on player characters would fit nicely on the users personal pages. This would get rid of thos red link names and give something more interesting than a lil "I got tired of the red link" profile pages. As for further policies i believe the admin team should sit down in a msn conference and get them typed up. --[[User:Solid Rock|Solid Rock]] 09:38, 13 November 2006 (GMT) |
Revision as of 09:38, 13 November 2006
Policies
There's going to need to be quite a few of these. The first thing that strikes my mind is: articles about players, player characters and clans. Are they allowed at all? What is allowed to be said? Who is supposed to contribute? Etc... Then we have the question of do we try and replicate (to some degree) policies like Wikipedia's verifiability and NPOV? Etc? CMaster 15:28, 7 November 2006 (GMT)
- I agree - some policies will need to be created to get people to agree to it - I dont mind pages being created about players and clans as it would allow a nice roleplaying situation to occur where people could be hyper linked - although it could also cause flames and grafiti. --Delphi 16:09, 7 November 2006 (GMT)
- Id say clan articles should be left out but articles on player characters would fit nicely on the users personal pages. This would get rid of thos red link names and give something more interesting than a lil "I got tired of the red link" profile pages. As for further policies i believe the admin team should sit down in a msn conference and get them typed up. --Solid Rock 09:38, 13 November 2006 (GMT)
