Latest Neocron News and Information
- New test server patch #563 has been released to Vedeena
Difference between revisions of "Talk:ProtoPharm"
Logan Ford (talk | contribs) |
m |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
Bram, if you think there should be a gap then why http://www.techhaven.org/db/item/1761.html this? or the http://www.neocronicle.com/?p=255 neocronicle which differs from the VOTR http://www.votr-mag.com/?p=126! lol. The NC history uses the combined version..... now i come to think of it, people probably use both! --{{:User:Logan Ford/Sig2}} 15:44, 12 December 2008 (UTC) | Bram, if you think there should be a gap then why http://www.techhaven.org/db/item/1761.html this? or the http://www.neocronicle.com/?p=255 neocronicle which differs from the VOTR http://www.votr-mag.com/?p=126! lol. The NC history uses the combined version..... now i come to think of it, people probably use both! --{{:User:Logan Ford/Sig2}} 15:44, 12 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I'd like to propose that we make Proto Pharm into a page which lists everything based on Protopharm, i.e. epics HQ etc. then both can be searched for and we dont have to migrate lots of links? {{:User:Delphi/Sig4}} 16:28, 12 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 16:28, 12 December 2008
Movement
I think this page should be moved to Proto Pharm, the name is two words. --Reaction 20:08, 9 September 2008 (BST)
The big question!
Can we resolve this one? Is it staying ProtoPharm or are we going to move it to seperate the two words? if so the epic will have to moved also and tidy up the links already around the wiki. I agree with Reaction this is two words and should be moved--[admin] Logan Ford • (talk) 13:21, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
The game's text (can't check graphics at the mo) calls it ProtoPharm: "09-12-2008 22:37:15 > You gained a little sympathy with ProtoPharm." --StevenJ 13:28, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
Ok ingame Wording is PROTOPHARM on the Faction screen, and on the NPC's. However the HQ is "PROTO PHARM HEADQUARTERS" and also the Logo does have a gap in it.
Trust KK not to be consistant, but I think it should be Proto Pharm. --Brammers 13:50, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
Sounds about right :p Searching the nc forum for 'Protopharm' returns 500 results. Searching for '"Proto Pharm"' returns 81 results. Also, my console.log file has two mentions spoken by runners of "proto pharm" and 7 "protopharm" --StevenJ 13:52, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
Bram, if you think there should be a gap then why http://www.techhaven.org/db/item/1761.html this? or the http://www.neocronicle.com/?p=255 neocronicle which differs from the VOTR http://www.votr-mag.com/?p=126! lol. The NC history uses the combined version..... now i come to think of it, people probably use both! --[admin] Logan Ford • (talk) 15:44, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
I'd like to propose that we make Proto Pharm into a page which lists everything based on Protopharm, i.e. epics HQ etc. then both can be searched for and we dont have to migrate lots of links? δφ (delphi) 16:28, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
